There hadn't
been a clergyman in our family in living memory, not
since Cardinal Richelieu and his Holy Thugs burned my
Huguenot ancestors out of France in 1572. So it struck
my siblings and parents as something more than odd when
I decided to become ordained in 1990, especially after
having lived my previous thirty four years as a staunch
agnostic.
“Jesus, Kev, you don't even believe in God!” my brother
had exclaimed over dinner after I broke the news.
It was true.
No divine voice had whispered in my ear, nor had a
burning bush appeared to me, although I had seen some
pretty other worldly things at various singles bars. So
what had prompted me into the ministry, against all
reason?
Martin Luther warned us to distinguish between a genuine
revelation and what may simply be a bit of undigested
carrot. And William Combes, an interior Salish spirit
dancer who struggles on the edge of oblivion on
Vancouver's skid row, told me once that one should never
talk about the sacred lest it lose its power. So I won't
try to explain what I was feeling back then, except to
say that it was something authentic.
Since spiritual impulses have never been that important
in the life of organized Christianity, and certainly not
among its clergy, my fuzzy sense of calling didn't
impede my entry into the ranks of United Church
ministry; on the contrary, it actually helped my
advancement as a pastor, since, to quote one of the
worried bureaucrats who eventually helped expel me from
that church, “When you put God first, you're being
pastorally incompetent.” Hmm.
The stark truth is that, what caused me to eventually
return to my roots, so to speak, and embrace agnosticism
again, was the experience of living and working within a
mainstream Christian church.
It took a
number of years for the mask to slip, and for the thing
behind the appearance to step forward. During those
confused years, I was a lot like a pesty germ in a
system, irritating the host and causing it to gather its
army of antibodies against my dangerous example. For my
scandal was simply to take everything in Christianity at
face value, and try to put into practice what Jesus
talked about.
Ah, the naïve idiot, I can hear you thinking. But idiots
always have been one of the more subversive and
necessary characters in our western culture,
de-assembling all the arrangements with their simple
questions and simpler actions: people like Jesus
himself.
Much to the alarm of some of my older parishioners, I
often referred to Jesus as a humanist. The guy broke all
the sabbath rules, tackled the religious hypocrites and
even said that man was more important than religion. The
one time he ever went into a church, he ended up
trashing the place. And, despite what the Vatican will
tell you, most of the Gospels portray him as simply a
man who continually spoke about and lived something he
called “the kingdom of heaven”.
Recent Biblical scholarship, particularly the
“Historical Jesus” seminar at the University of Chicago,
suggests that barely 12 percent of Jesus' words in
scripture were likely spoken by him; and of that 12
percent, most of it is talking about this “kingdom of
heaven” thing. So what is it?
Jesus referred to it most clearly on two occasions, in
simple parables that the Jesus Seminar folks regard as
genuine words from his mouth: namely, when he compared
the kingdom of heaven to a mustard seed, and to yeast in
dough.
These are both pretty alarming and unusual metaphors for
a supposedly “devout” Jew to have used. For one thing,
the mustard seed and yeast are both explicitly
anti-establishment and even anti-religious symbols. The
mustard seed, though tiny, yields a noxious, weed-like
plant that rapidly takes over and kills all the other
vegetation, kind of like an AIDS virus. Jesus' peasant
listeners would have hated the mustard plant as the
number one enemy of their crop, and yet it's the symbol
he used for the new social order he called heaven's
kingdom: something that takes over everything.
Yeast was a
sign of corruption and impurity in the Judaism of two
millenia ago, in contrast to the sterile and unchanging
unleavened bread used in religious practice. Yet in
referring to it, Jesus said it was like heaven's kingdom
because it worked through the entire loaf organically,
making it alive, transforming it in secret and hidden
ways, and causing the bread to be born. Bread and fish,
shared around a common table, was for nearly three
centuries Christianity's sole public symbol.
So what this odd homeless man is portraying, and
offering, is what in his native language of Aramaic was
termed “a realm of eternity”, which the Greeks
translated into “kingdom of the heavens”, basilea tou
theo, or “fortress of the gods”. The Aramaic term was
closer to Jesus' description, which was simply this: a
new realm is present on the earth, parallel but hidden,
and made manifest in direct human interaction, without
mediator or hierarchy.
In effect, this new realm has mixed up all the social
and political arrangements, like a subversive yeast, and
made every person equal within a new body, like freshly
baked bread.
Holy shit, I realized one day: this Jesus was not just a
social revolutionary, but an agnostic humanist as well,
since the one thing that religion
cannot
abide is unmediated equality, for such a joining of
heaven and earth sweeps away all the distinctions of
“saved” and “fallen” in favour of a single dignity of
mankind.
Of course, this knowing created something of a dilemma
for me, there in my pulpit. For who was I to interpret
such a wonderful and simple reality for anyone else? How
could I “pray” for anybody, as if I had a better insight
into truth, or more power, than another? None of that
hierarchy of religious experts is present in the world
Jesus envisioned.
Fortunately, my dilemma was resolved when the United
Church terminated me with extreme prejudice. Like
Colonel Kurtz, I had realized the monstrous lie that I
was a part of.
What Emperor likes having his nudity pointed out? It
makes him go, well, you know, a bit funny in the head.
He starts dispatching assassins and press releases.
The truth of
who and what he actually is cannot ever be spoken, for
he has become as unchanging as the unleavened bread:
infallible, all-knowing, and merciless in his wrath.
As such a monarch, the Christian church can kill with
impunity while quoting the man from Nazareth. It can
starve and beat children to death for generations, and
escape all judgement. It can bury their little bodies in
secret and issue verbal apologies and a few dollars to
the relatives. And it can destroy the life and good name
of anyone from its ranks who dares to speak of these
crimes.
Being such a one, I had to learn the hard way that when
we remove divinity from the human person and assign it
to another dimension, we are precipitating mass murder,
and our own ending. Such a fate is what Jesus, and so
many others, have tried so hard to prevent. He wept
blood, according to some, the night before he was
arrested and tortured to death, much like the tears that
come when you know that maybe we all are doomed, that
none of our words will stop the gentle flesh from being
ripped or the innocent hearts from being violated yet
again.
A German clergyman had the same kind of change as me
years ago, during the Hitler nightmare, when he came to
see his commonality with everyone. Wolf-Dieter
Zimmerman, a member of the banned Confessing Church
movement that worked in the anti-Nazi resistance, had
this to say shortly before he died in 1982:
“As a Christian, I had come to see myself as being a
special kind of person, set apart from humanity by our
unique revelation. And yet under the conditions of
dictatorship, forced to work with many different people,
Communists, Catholics, Jews, I learned that what
mattered was not our unique confession but the power of
a single act, performed for any person, no matter how
unworthy. Faced with exposure and death at every moment,
I saw myself as the same as all of my fellow resistance
workers, whether Christian or not, and in that shared
danger and struggle, something new was born in me. I
became not a special person anymore, but a common man,
which is all the divinity that was ever necessary.”
This is the yeast Jesus tasted, the subversive seed that
threatens to make the body alive and growing once more,
transforming all it touches into the common loaf that
all can feed from, that costs nothing, that was here
from the beginning and somehow stolen from us. And there
it sits patiently in our most broken part, ever eternal,
waiting for the right soil and the receptive heart and
willing hand, to bring life again.
I didn't learn any of this in the church, as an official
Christian; I realized after much loss that I had known
it all along, and had been made to forget it. I think
that knowing is in all of us, and that to be fully human
is to remember that there is no authority over us, save
truth; that “mine” and “yours” are fantasy; and that
compassion is the beginning and end of divinity on
earth.
There's a lot of wisdom in that little bit of yeast. And
just think: without it, we wouldn't have beer!
..........................................................................
Kevin Annett
is a former United Church minister who serves on the
Board of the B.C. Humanist Association.
He founded
the Truth Commission into Genocide in Canada in 2000 and
is the author of two books and several studies on the
genocide of native people in Canada. In 2007, he
co-produced the award winning documentary film
"UNREPENTANT". Kevin lives and works with indigenous and
low-income people in Nanaimo and Vancouver.
See his
website at:
www.hiddenfromhistory.org
Kevin D. Annett
260 Kennedy St.
Nanaimo, BC V9R
2H8
ph: 250-753-3345
or 1-888-265-1007
Read and Hear
the truth of Genocide in Canada, past and present, at this
website:
www.hiddenfromhistory.org
... and on this
radio program: "Hidden from History", every Monday from 1-2
pm (PST) on CFRO 102.7 FM (www.coopradio.org) (Vancouver)
"When the desire for Truth and Virtue becomes the only bias
in our mind, only then can we know in ourselves what is
right."
Peter Annett, Humanist and dissident, 1769 (jailed and
persecuted by the Church of England for his questioning of
the Bible and the church)