A behind the scenes
struggle is raging between the White House and US government
scientists who want to force ships to slow down near the
calving grounds of the almost extinct right whale.
The right whale controversy is the latest example of the
Bush Administration sidestepping the advice of its on
scientists which are aimed at protecting endangered species
or threats to the environment. On Monday, a judge had to
order the administration to release its much-delayed
decision aimed at protecting the polar bear under the
Endangered Species Act.
Only 350 of the whales remain in Atlantic waters off
America's eastern seaboard and they are considered one of
the most endangered species on Earth. Government scientists
warn that the loss of just one more pregnant female is
enough to doom the species, which was almost hunted to
extinction in the 19th century.
Every year around three right whales are either injured
or killed in collisions with ocean-going vessels like
containerized cargo ships even though they are protected
under the Endangered Species Act. Right whales frequently
wash up on shore bearing deep scars from being struck by
ships propellers.
To reduce ship strikes the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) decided that ships should
restrict their speed to 10 knots or less near whale feeding
and calving grounds during parts of the year.
But Mr Cheney's office, which tends to operate in
secrecy, sent letters repeatedly questioning whether the
rule was needed according to leaked documents. Flatly
contradicting the scientific research Mr Cheney's staff
argued, "that we have no evidence that lowering the speeds
of 'large ships' will actually make a difference."
A critique of the scientists analysis by the
administration led to a strongly worded reply in which they
said: "The basic facts remain that there is a direct
relationship" between a vessel's speed and the likelihood of
death or serious injury to the whale, and "at vessel speeds
at or below 10 knots, the probability of death/serious
injury is greatly reduced."
There was, the scientists wrote, "no basis to overturn
our previous conclusion that imposing a speed limit on large
vessels would be beneficial to whales."
Congressman Henry Waxman who publicised the
correspondence said it was "the latest instance of the White
House ignoring scientists and other experts."
A number of European shipping companies have strongly
opposed the NOAA proposal, saying slowing their vessels will
hurt the economy and cost the industry money. But while the
World Shipping Council wants to block the rule, but the
largely US Chamber of Shipping of America is in favour and
its director of maritime affairs, Kathy J. Metcalf has told
the White House that "the economic impacts" of cutting
shipping speeds "are well worth the benefits."
The right whales migrate from the Gulf of Maine to warmer
waters off Florida and Georgia to give birth. The exhausted
mothers, which have not eaten for weeks, then make their way
slowly up the coast with their young, passing close by busy
shipping ports off Georgia and Massachusetts.
Since NOAA scientists first tried to order ships to
reduce speed, at least three right whales have died from
ship strikes and propellers have wounded two. Voluntary
efforts to get ships to look out for whales known to be in
their area have been a total failures, according to
scientists who can log their progress by monitoring GPS
satellite data.
Beth Allgood, of the International Fund for Animal
Welfare, said the refusal by the White House to implement
the new speed restrictions were "not a huge burden on
industry; it's a huge burden on the whales."